<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The logic of data logging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeelabs.org/2009/03/22/the-logic-of-data-logging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeelabs.org/2009/03/22/the-logic-of-data-logging/</link>
	<description>Computing stuff tied to the physical world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:55:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcw</title>
		<link>http://jeelabs.org/2009/03/22/the-logic-of-data-logging/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>jcw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeelab.wordpress.com/?p=1101#comment-49</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Glad you like this Jee stuff. I use the RFM12B&#039;s because they handle packets quite efficiently, with decent baudrates for signaling. As for ATtiny vs ATmega: the price difference is relatively small, I went for ATmega&#039;s because of their Arduino compatibility. But these are just basic low-level technical choices. I find that both software and mechanical issues take a lot more time to figure out and make decisions...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks -jcw&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you like this Jee stuff. I use the RFM12B&#8217;s because they handle packets quite efficiently, with decent baudrates for signaling. As for ATtiny vs ATmega: the price difference is relatively small, I went for ATmega&#8217;s because of their Arduino compatibility. But these are just basic low-level technical choices. I find that both software and mechanical issues take a lot more time to figure out and make decisions&#8230;</p>

<p>Thanks -jcw</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://jeelabs.org/2009/03/22/the-logic-of-data-logging/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeelab.wordpress.com/?p=1101#comment-48</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jean-Claude,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have just discovered your blog yesterday, I must say this is really amazing. I spent last couple of months working on similar idea. My sensor network however uses much simpler RF communication - I use Quasar AM 433MHz modules QAM-TX1 / QAM-RX2. I also use ATTiny13/45 for sensors and ATMega8/168 for receiver. Tinys are really dirt cheap, for what they are capable of doing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway I really like your idea of JeeHub / JeeHub. As I am facing very similar kind of issues. I will take a look more closely on your implementation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keep up good work!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,
Stan&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jean-Claude,</p>

<p>I have just discovered your blog yesterday, I must say this is really amazing. I spent last couple of months working on similar idea. My sensor network however uses much simpler RF communication &#8211; I use Quasar AM 433MHz modules QAM-TX1 / QAM-RX2. I also use ATTiny13/45 for sensors and ATMega8/168 for receiver. Tinys are really dirt cheap, for what they are capable of doing.</p>

<p>Anyway I really like your idea of JeeHub / JeeHub. As I am facing very similar kind of issues. I will take a look more closely on your implementation.</p>

<p>Keep up good work!</p>

<p>Cheers,
Stan</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.265 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 07:23:17 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
