<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JeeLink build woes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeelabs.org/2009/08/16/jeelink-build-woes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeelabs.org/2009/08/16/jeelink-build-woes/</link>
	<description>Computing stuff tied to the physical world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:55:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcw</title>
		<link>http://jeelabs.org/2009/08/16/jeelink-build-woes/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>jcw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.jeelabs.org/?p=2518#comment-197</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m basically following what others have done using various tips on the web, such as this one:
http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/tutorial_info.php?tutorials_id=59&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;See also all the reflow posts on this weblog:
http://news.jeelabs.org/?s=reflow&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve done at least a dozen reflows by now, they all worked just fine on my 700W grill with  up to 4 JeeNode-size boards. I&#039;m still using leaded solder though, will soon switch to lead-free and raise the temperature by some 20°C.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The main issue is to apply a consistent (small!) amount of solder paste. I&#039;m looking into various stencil options.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m basically following what others have done using various tips on the web, such as this one:
<a href="http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/tutorial_info.php?tutorials_id=59" rel="nofollow">http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/tutorial_info.php?tutorials_id=59</a></p>

<p>See also all the reflow posts on this weblog:
<a href="http://news.jeelabs.org/?s=reflow" rel="nofollow">http://news.jeelabs.org/?s=reflow</a></p>

<p>I&#8217;ve done at least a dozen reflows by now, they all worked just fine on my 700W grill with  up to 4 JeeNode-size boards. I&#8217;m still using leaded solder though, will soon switch to lead-free and raise the temperature by some 20°C.</p>

<p>The main issue is to apply a consistent (small!) amount of solder paste. I&#8217;m looking into various stencil options.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: José Xavier</title>
		<link>http://jeelabs.org/2009/08/16/jeelink-build-woes/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>José Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 01:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.jeelabs.org/?p=2518#comment-196</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You have to explain how you use the reflow :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to explain how you use the reflow :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcw</title>
		<link>http://jeelabs.org/2009/08/16/jeelink-build-woes/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>jcw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.jeelabs.org/?p=2518#comment-181</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Marius, Stephen - good to see y&#039;all back as well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve changed the 1µF to 1 10 µF, now on both sides of the VR. Since they are ceramic, I thought maybe no extra 0.1µF decoupling is needed?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for reprogramming the FTDI, yes that could be a good idea for later - especially once I get to work on some new code to make it easier to manage/upload stuff to JeeLinks and JeeNodes. With multiple units connected, default serial port names are a bit awkward - though the Arduino IDE 0017 helps by supporting multiple serial consoles at once, IIUC.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m still debugging the SMD boards - also ordered a magnifying glass with proper lighting.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Marius, Stephen &#8211; good to see y&#8217;all back as well.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve changed the 1µF to 1 10 µF, now on both sides of the VR. Since they are ceramic, I thought maybe no extra 0.1µF decoupling is needed?</p>

<p>As for reprogramming the FTDI, yes that could be a good idea for later &#8211; especially once I get to work on some new code to make it easier to manage/upload stuff to JeeLinks and JeeNodes. With multiple units connected, default serial port names are a bit awkward &#8211; though the Arduino IDE 0017 helps by supporting multiple serial consoles at once, IIUC.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m still debugging the SMD boards &#8211; also ordered a magnifying glass with proper lighting.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Eaton</title>
		<link>http://jeelabs.org/2009/08/16/jeelink-build-woes/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Eaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.jeelabs.org/?p=2518#comment-180</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome back Jean Claude, hope you had a great break!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back Jean Claude, hope you had a great break!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marius Kintel</title>
		<link>http://jeelabs.org/2009/08/16/jeelink-build-woes/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius Kintel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.jeelabs.org/?p=2518#comment-179</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi again,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another idea: It&#039;s possible to reprogram the EEPROM of the FTDI chips and change things like device ID, device name etc. This could be a nice feature to be able to auto detect JeeLink boards on the host side and not confuse it with a normal FTDI serial port.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Marius&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again,</p>

<p>Another idea: It&#8217;s possible to reprogram the EEPROM of the FTDI chips and change things like device ID, device name etc. This could be a nice feature to be able to auto detect JeeLink boards on the host side and not confuse it with a normal FTDI serial port.</p>

<p>-Marius</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marius Kintel</title>
		<link>http://jeelabs.org/2009/08/16/jeelink-build-woes/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius Kintel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.jeelabs.org/?p=2518#comment-178</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome back!
I would toss in a 100nf decoupling capacitor on VBUS and 3V3OUT, and probably also a bigger one (10uF or smth.) on VBUS.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Apart from that it looks ok to me..&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Marius&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back!
I would toss in a 100nf decoupling capacitor on VBUS and 3V3OUT, and probably also a bigger one (10uF or smth.) on VBUS.</p>

<p>Apart from that it looks ok to me..</p>

<p>Cheers,</p>

<p>-Marius</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.371 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 06:11:27 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
